Independent seismic context • Archive reviewed 28 August 2026Verify urgent alerts with local emergency authorities
Mountainous terrain in Sichuan illustrating the setting of the Lushan earthquake
Historical event archive • Sichuan, China

The 2013 Lushan earthquake

A strong, shallow earthquake struck near Ya’an on 20 April 2013, causing widespread building damage, landslides and a large emergency response across western Sichuan.

This archive consolidates the principal information carried in the original rolling report. Figures changed repeatedly during the first week; the final update on this page recorded 196 confirmed deaths, 21 people missing and more than 15,000 injuries. These are historical figures, not a live incident bulletin.

Archive note: Early earthquake measurements and impact totals were preliminary. Different seismic agencies reported slightly different magnitudes and depths as data were refined.

Event at a glance

Origin time00:02 UTC20 April 2013
Local time08:0220 April 2013
Reported magnitude6.6–7.0Varied by agency
Reported depthAbout 12–20 kmShallow crustal event
Primary areaLushan and Ya’anWestern Sichuan, China
Archive impact total196 deaths21 people listed missing

The epicentral area lay roughly 100 kilometres southwest of Chengdu in mountainous country where steep slopes, narrow roads and scattered settlements complicated access. The event is commonly known as the Lushan or Ya’an earthquake.

Steep forested mountain valley representing landslide-prone terrain in western Sichuan
Mountainous terrain amplified the logistical challenge: aftershocks and rain increased concern about slope failures and blocked roads.

What happened

The earthquake damaged older masonry and timber buildings most severely, while many other structures became temporarily unsafe. Reports from the affected region described disrupted electricity, water and telecommunications, damaged roads and bridges, and widespread displacement.

Strong shaking was reported across Sichuan and in neighbouring areas. Accounts collected at the time commonly described swaying in upper floors, rattling windows, moving furniture and repeated aftershocks. Such observations are useful context, but they do not replace instrument measurements or structural inspection.

Impact and response

By the later updates, official summaries listed more than 15,000 injured people and more than 230,000 relocated residents. Rural and urban housing sustained extensive collapse or serious damage. Counts were often reported in rooms rather than complete buildings, which caused confusion when figures were repeated outside their original administrative context.

  • Emergency personnel searched damaged communities and transported injured residents to nearby hospitals.
  • Temporary shelters, food, drinking water, blankets and medical supplies were moved into the affected area.
  • Road clearance and the restoration of electricity and communications were treated as operational priorities.
  • Schools used temporary classrooms while inspections and repairs continued.
  • Water sampling identified sources that required treatment before drinking.

Aftershocks and secondary hazards

Thousands of aftershocks were recorded during the first days, including several events around magnitude 5. The sequence presented a continuing risk to unstable structures and to personnel working in damaged buildings.

Landslides were a central concern. Rainfall complicated transport and raised the possibility of further slope failures in Lushan and Baoxing counties. Monitoring teams subsequently identified numerous locations requiring assessment. Reservoirs, dams, roads, bridges and water infrastructure were also inspected for earthquake-related damage.

Preparedness principle: After strong shaking, expect aftershocks, stay clear of visibly damaged structures and slopes, and follow current local emergency instructions. General guidance is available in the preparedness library.

Archive chronology

Mainshock and immediate response

The earthquake struck shortly after 08:00 local time. Search-and-rescue teams, medical workers and relief supplies were deployed while roads, utilities and communications were assessed.

Access and shelter operations expanded

Aftershocks continued. Temporary accommodation and supply distribution grew as authorities worked to reach communities affected by landslides and damaged roads.

Rain increased slope concerns

Road access improved in some areas, but rainfall and unstable hillsides complicated transport. Electricity and communications began returning to additional communities.

Medical and resettlement work continued

Temporary hospitals and shelters remained in use. Updated assessments documented extensive housing damage and displacement.

Impact totals were refined

Later administrative reporting reduced discrepancies in casualty and missing-person figures and added detail about damage to rural and urban housing.

Water and education became priorities

Testing found that some local water sources required treatment. Temporary learning spaces supported the gradual resumption of classes.

Geological monitoring intensified

Attention increasingly shifted to rainfall, unstable slopes and other secondary hazards while relief and recovery operations continued.

Selected seismic sequence

The original report listed many agency solutions for the mainshock and early aftershocks. This condensed table preserves representative entries without implying that every preliminary value remained definitive.

UTC timeEventMagnitude rangeReported depth
20 Apr, 00:02Mainshock6.6–7.012–20 km
20 Apr, 00:31Aftershock4.8–5.010–15 km
20 Apr, 01:11Aftershock4.9–5.010–22 km
20 Apr, 01:37Aftershock4.9–5.112–20 km
20 Apr, 03:34Aftershock5.1–5.212–20 km
20 Apr, 20:53Aftershock5.1–5.29–21 km

Reading the historical figures

Rapid disaster reporting is inherently provisional. Casualty totals can move as local records are reconciled, while building counts can refer to rooms, households or complete structures. Economic-loss estimates in the source also varied substantially and were modelled before complete assessments were available, so they are not presented here as settled totals.

For additional scientific and geographic background, read Understanding the Lushan–Ya’an earthquake. The earlier rolling material is retained in the linked event archive.

Explore the archive

Related earthquake context